Education Secretary Betsy DeVos endured testy exchanges on Thursday at a House Education and Labor Committee hearing on her plan to overhaul an Obama-era federal student loan forgiveness policy.
DeVos appeared on Capitol Hill after facing lawsuits for her departments unwillingness to fully wipe out the federal student loans of borrowers who alleged that several for-profit education chains, including the now-defunct Corinthian Colleges, falsely advertised their ties to employers and the transferability of credits. Instead, the Department comes up with a new plan that would provide partial relief to most of the borrowers, based on their present-day income.
“In response to a surge in claims, the Obama administration issued a new Borrower Defense rule to streamline the process for providing relief to defrauded students,” said Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.), the chairman of the Committee, in his opening statement (pdf). “However, under the present leadership, the Department refused to implement the Borrower Defense rule.”
In response, DeVos blamed Obama administration for intentionally creating the problem and leaving it behind.
“We inherited from the Obama administration more than 64,000 borrower defense claims,” she said, adding that the previous administration made “no process in place” for verifying that these students had actually been defrauded by their schools.
“In fact, the prior administration was encouraging claims to be filed knowing full well it lacked the ability to even accurately track them,” said DeVos in her opening statement. “Rather than deal with the claims, they just walked away and left these tens of thousands [of] claims behind for this administration.”
“No proof was required of the students that she or he had been defrauded?” asked Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC), the top Republican on the Committee.
“No,” replied DeVos. “There was no process in place for actually considering the claims.”
During the 4-hour-long hearing, the house Democrats barraged DeVos with questions about her commitment to students and taxpayers. “Did you not state at the very beginning of your testimony that students are your No. 1 priorRead More – Source